Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 147 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Memory - €1379.0 vs €1429.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €8.84 vs €10.28 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
198th Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
198th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
75%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10600KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
