Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 107 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - €14.01 vs €19.99 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74650 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
75
70.09345794392523%
Value, €/FPS
€19.99/FPS
70.08504252126063%
Price, €
€1499
100%
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74645 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
191st Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
191st Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41.15657761244505%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
46.64502164502164%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
191st Variation
Core i9-11900
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2130
83.89129578574241%
Multi-Core
8816
63.470122390208786%
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
