Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 67% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - 150 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - €11.46 vs €13.32 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 30% cheaper than Memory - €1199.00 vs €1719.00
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,719 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 475 minutes ago
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 468 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
189th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
189th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
189th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
