Key Differences
In short — Formacom outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Formacom - €1789.0 vs €2855.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Formacom - €7.85 vs €11.07 per FPS
Advantages of Formacom PC
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 1 than Memory - 258 vs 228 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
189th Variation
FPS
228
88.37209302325581%
Value, €/FPS
€7.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1789
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2849 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.07/FPS
70.91237579042456%
Price, €
€2855
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,855 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
189th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
189th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
90.58823529411765%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
96.58437605681435%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
189th Variation
Core i5-13600K
null-core
Single-Core
2665
85.94001934859723%
Multi-Core
14848
70.70476190476191%
Memory PC | vs | Formacom PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
