Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - 216 vs 214 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 5% cheaper than Memory - €1699.95 vs €1789.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing F1 22 than Memory - €7.94 vs €8.28 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
214
99.07407407407408%
Value, €/FPS
€7.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
189th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
189th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
66.95975650997633%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
74.99999999999999%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
189th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
96.03603603603604%
Multi-Core
14848
85.66812831756289%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
Memory PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
