Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 106% better in New World than GameMachines Cube - - 167 vs 81 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 62% cheaper than Megaport - €1279.0 vs €3379.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing New World than Megaport - €15.79 vs €20.23 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €3,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 483 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
81
48%
Value, €/FPS
€15.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1279
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
75%
Multi-Core
11527
54%
Megaport PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
