Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than GameMachines Neo - - 196 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 0% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than GameMachines Neo - - €8.67 vs €8.68 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Up to 14% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €1459.0 vs €1699.0
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
85%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7506 minutes ago
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79%
Multi-Core
11527
59%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |