Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than Captiva - 467 vs 407 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Captiva - €2139.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing World of Tanks than Captiva - €4.58 vs €5.67 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
FPS
467
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2139
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77737 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
407
87.15203426124198%
Value, €/FPS
€5.67/FPS
80.77601410934744%
Price, €
€2309
92%
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
73.10924369747899%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
76.76470588235293%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
85.34453781512606%
Multi-Core
13890
72.21586773422065%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
