Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 148% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 201 vs 81 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 62% cheaper than Megaport - €1019.00 vs €2649.00
- Up to 5% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €12.58 vs €13.18 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €2,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 411 minutes ago
Buy for €1,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 423 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
26th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
