Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-11900F - 305 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €400.98 vs €472.75
- Up to 5% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-14900KF - €1.47 vs €1.55 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
305
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
95%
Price, €
€472.75
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €472.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
272
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€400.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €400.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |