Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - 276 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €969.00 vs €999.00
- Up to 17% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €3.51 vs €4.22 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
237
86%
Value, €/FPS
€4.22/FPS
83%
Price, €
€999
96%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6115 minutes ago
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6111 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
385th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
28%
GPU Winner
385th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
