Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Kiebel outperforms the cheaper MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Kiebel - €999.00 vs €1299.00
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - 315 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €4.12 vs €4.22 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
237
75%
Value, €/FPS
€4.22/FPS
98%
Price, €
€999
100%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
315
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1299
76%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
94%
Multi-Core
8847
87%
8th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
