Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 outperforms the cheaper SYSTEMTREFF Basic on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SYSTEMTREFF Basic is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Counter-Strike 2 than SYSTEMTREFF Basic - 237 vs 186 FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €574.9 vs €1199.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €3.09 vs €5.06 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.06/FPS
61.06719367588933%
Price, €
€1199
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78401 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
186
78.48101265822784%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€574.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €574.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
30.03003003003003%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
68.64006864006865%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700G
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1983
91.00504818724185%
Multi-Core
8740
98.79055046908557%
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700G |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB HDD |
