Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ankermann Business V2 Work is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 65% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 51 vs 31 FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €699.0 vs €1199.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €22.55 vs €23.51 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€23.51/FPS
95.91663122075713%
Price, €
€1199
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78223 minutes ago
FPS
31
60.78431372549019%
Value, €/FPS
€22.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
3.040540540540541%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
6.949806949806951%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
