Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 outperforms the cheaper GEEKOM A8 Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GEEKOM A8 Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than GEEKOM A8 Mini - 46 vs 45 FPS
Advantages of GEEKOM A8 Mini PC
- Up to 13% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €1049.0 vs €1199.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Deathloop than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €23.31 vs €26.07 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
46
100%
Value, €/FPS
€26.07/FPS
89.41311852704257%
Price, €
€1199
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77940 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
45
97.82608695652173%
Value, €/FPS
€23.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77926 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
57.41379310344827%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
66.98275862068965%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
91.9797382861967%
Multi-Core
8847
76.46499567847881%
1st Variation
Ryzen 9 8945HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2369
100%
Multi-Core
11570
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | GEEKOM A8 Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
