Key Differences
In short — SYSTEMTREFF High-End outperforms the cheaper MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
- Up to 62% cheaper than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €1299.0 vs €3414.9
- Up to 18% better value when playing No Man's Sky than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €14.93 vs €18.19 per FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Performs up to 122% better in No Man's Sky than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - 193 vs 87 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
87
45%
Value, €/FPS
€14.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1299
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
165th Variation
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.19/FPS
82%
Price, €
€3414.9
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,414.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
165th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
12%
165th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400
null-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
74%
165th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB HDD |
