Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 197% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 377 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €4.19 vs €5.5 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €699.0 vs €1579.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1579
44%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
FPS
127
33.687002652519894%
Value, €/FPS
€5.5/FPS
76.18181818181819%
Price, €
€699
100%
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.0227272727272727%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.422924901185771%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |