Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 19% better in F1 22 than Megaport - 190 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing F1 22 than Megaport - €8.42 vs €9.43 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 6% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €1499.0 vs €1599.0
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1599
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2589 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
93%
Multi-Core
11527
82%
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
