Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 113% better in Battlefield 1 than ACEMAGIC Mini - 160 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than ACEMAGIC Mini - €9.12 vs €9.85 per FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGIC Mini PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €739.0 vs €1459.0
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1459
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3988 minutes ago
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
78.57747671464861%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
58.93310753598645%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | ACEMAGIC Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
