Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines HyperCube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Megaport - €1099.00 vs €2339.00
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €14.46 vs €17.33 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 78% better in Dead Space than GameMachines HyperCube - - 135 vs 76 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
76
56%
Value, €/FPS
€14.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 379 minutes ago
Buy for €2,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 385 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
29%
GPU Winner
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
89%
Multi-Core
13890
94%
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
