Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines HyperCube - outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 102% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 93 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €11.28 vs €17.59 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than GameMachines HyperCube - - €809.00 vs €1049.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
FPS
93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172230 minutes ago
Buy for €809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
458th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
458th Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
97%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon RX 6400 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
