Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than GameMachines HyperCube - - 129 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than GameMachines HyperCube - - €999.00 vs €1049.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GameMachines HyperCube - - €7.74 vs €8.74 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173982 minutes ago
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 624 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
87%
Multi-Core
8910
66%
24th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1000 GB SSD |
