Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines HyperCube - outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 36% better in Overwatch 2 than Memory - 178 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Memory - €5.89 vs €6.48 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than GameMachines HyperCube - - €849.00 vs €1049.00
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184237 minutes ago
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
163rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
163rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
