Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cyclon - RGB outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cyclon - RGB Gaming PC
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Warcraft than Megaport - 194 vs 171 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than GameMachines Cyclon - RGB - €1219.0 vs €1579.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Warcraft than GameMachines Cyclon - RGB - €7.01 vs €8.14 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.14/FPS
86%
Price, €
€1579
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 549 minutes ago
Buy for €1,219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 891 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
39th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
39th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700F
null-core
Single-Core
2362
94%
Multi-Core
11527
85%
39th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cyclon - RGB Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
