Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 20% better in Borderlands 3 than Captiva - 174 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Captiva - €1979.0 vs €1989.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Captiva - €11.37 vs €13.72 per FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
5th Variation
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1979
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19546 minutes ago
Buy for €1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
5th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
80%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
82%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |