Key Differences
In short — SYSTEMTREFF High-End outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X10 High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X10 High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 32% cheaper than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €1302.99 vs €1919.9
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €9.31 vs €10.55 per FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Performs up to 30% better in No Man's Sky than ERAZER Engineer X10 High End - 182 vs 140 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
140
76.92307692307693%
Value, €/FPS
€9.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1302.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,302.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4998 minutes ago
214th Variation
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.55/FPS
88.24644549763033%
Price, €
€1919.9
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,919.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61.464646464646464%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62.1933621933622%
214th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
214th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13400F | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
