Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X10 High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X10 High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Megaport - €1302.99 vs €2199.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €16.09 vs €16.29 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 67% better in Dead Space than ERAZER Engineer X10 High End - 135 vs 81 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
81
60%
Value, €/FPS
€16.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1302.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,302.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5019 minutes ago
35th Variation
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.29/FPS
98.77225291589933%
Price, €
€2199
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
42.61204481792717%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
42.254901960784316%
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13400F | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |