Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ERAZER Engineer X10 High End outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 140 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Megaport - €1302.99 vs €1399.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €9.31 vs €10.14 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1302.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,302.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2046 minutes ago
30th Variation
FPS
138
98.57142857142858%
Value, €/FPS
€10.14/FPS
91.8145956607495%
Price, €
€1399
93%
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
95.1528384279476%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
