Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 36% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Dell XPS 8950 - 436 vs 320 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
29th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
56%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
83%
Multi-Core
10780
69%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |