Key Differences
In short — Captiva Ultimate outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC
- Performs up to 30% better in Monster Hunter: World than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - 284 vs 218 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Captiva Ultimate - €2199.95 vs €4637.18
- Up to 38% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Captiva Ultimate - €10.09 vs €16.33 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.33/FPS
61.788120024494795%
Price, €
€4637.18
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,637.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1978 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
218
76.76056338028168%
Value, €/FPS
€10.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2199.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
56.50507328072153%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53.41085271317829%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
95.09938313913639%
Multi-Core
17332
88.27993684103296%
Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
