Key Differences
In short — Captiva Ultimate outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 212 vs 204 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 55% cheaper than Captiva Ultimate - €2079.0 vs €4637.18
- Up to 53% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Captiva Ultimate - €10.19 vs €21.87 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.87/FPS
46.593507087334245%
Price, €
€4637.18
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,637.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1975 minutes ago
15th Variation
FPS
204
96.22641509433963%
Value, €/FPS
€10.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2079
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
56.50507328072153%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53.41085271317829%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
97.96770743136555%
CPU Winner
Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
