Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 33% better in Death Stranding than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - 253 vs 190 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 61% cheaper than Captiva - €1599.95 vs €4089.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Death Stranding than Captiva - €8.42 vs €16.16 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
8th Variation
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.16/FPS
52.103960396039604%
Price, €
€4089
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3233 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
190
75.09881422924902%
Value, €/FPS
€8.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1599.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,599.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
8th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
44.64487034949267%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
42.97674418604651%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
89.28571428571429%
Multi-Core
17332
82.36859614105123%
Captiva PC | vs | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
