Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper SYSTEMTREFF High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SYSTEMTREFF High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - 105 vs 100 FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than Captiva - €2084.9 vs €2509.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Captiva - €20.85 vs €23.9 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €2,509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7335 minutes ago
64th Variation
FPS
100
95%
Value, €/FPS
€20.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2084.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,084.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
5th Variation
64th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
64th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
64th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
4.4 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2822
90%
Multi-Core
17479
83%
Captiva PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
