Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Gaming on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 10600% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Gaming - 107 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 97% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Gaming - €23.45 vs €819.0 per FPS
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Up to 67% cheaper than Captiva - €819.0 vs €2509.0
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €2,509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59183 minutes ago
33rd Variation
FPS
1
0.9345794392523363%
Value, €/FPS
€819/FPS
2.8632478632478633%
Price, €
€819
100%
Buy for €819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
5th Variation
33rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
33rd Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
44.44444444444444%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
22.22222222222222%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
33rd Variation
Ryzen 7 8700G
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2686
86.42213642213642%
Multi-Core
14235
67.65041345879669%
Captiva PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 8700G |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | Radeon 780M |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
