Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms SYSTEMTREFF Basic on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 267% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than SYSTEMTREFF Basic - 231 vs 63 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 7089 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
63
27%
Value, €/FPS
€13.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€859.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €859.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7089 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
22%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
7th Variation
Ryzen 7 8700G
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2686
86%
Multi-Core
14235
68%
Captiva PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 8700G |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | Radeon 780M |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB HDD |
