Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 374% better in Fortnite than Ankermann Business V2 - 161 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 40% better value when playing Fortnite than Ankermann Business V2 - €12.35 vs €20.56 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC
- Up to 65% cheaper than Captiva - €699.0 vs €1989.0
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Captiva PC Highend Gaming I79-337 | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Mainboard B660M | 64GB DDR4 RAM | RTX 4070 12GB GDDR6X | 2TB M.2 SSD | Windows 11 Home
Buy for €1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 476 minutes ago
Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | GeForce GTX 1650 | 32GB RAM | 1TB M.2 SSD | Wild Rabbit RGB Case | Windows 11 64Bit | 450W Ankermann | WiFi
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 1700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
