Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Captiva is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than Megaport - €1229.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Minecraft than Megaport - €1.96 vs €2.14 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Captiva - 770 vs 626 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
33rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
33rd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
