Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 375% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 76 vs 16 FPS
- Up to 63% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €16.04 vs €43.69 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than Captiva - €699.0 vs €1219.0
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52614 minutes ago
FPS
16
21.052631578947366%
Value, €/FPS
€43.69/FPS
36.71320668345159%
Price, €
€699
100%
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52624 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.33114215283484%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.8793503480278424%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
