Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 17 - 17,3 Zoll outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 40% cheaper than Razer Blade 17 - 17,3 Zoll - €1199.0 vs €1999.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Razer Blade 17 - 17,3 Zoll - €15.37 vs €25.6 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 17 - 17,3 Zoll Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 - 82 vs 78 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€25.6/FPS
60%
Price, €
€1999
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
70%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
94%
Multi-Core
13044
88%
TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 17 - 17,3 Zoll Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-12900 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 3840x2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
