Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 17-ck2003ns Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing HP Omen 17-ck2003ns Notebook is 366 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of HP Omen 17-ck2003ns Notebook
- Performs up to 23% better in War Thunder than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 259 vs 211 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
May 1st, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3164.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,164.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4881 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
May 1st, 2023
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2023
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
HP Omen 17-ck2003ns Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
