Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Gigabyte G5 KF5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 107 days newer than Gigabyte G5 KF5.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Gigabyte G5 KF5 - 236 vs 219 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
Jan 15th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 15th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
93%
Jan 15th, 2024
Core i5-13500
2.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2403
100%
Multi-Core
12346
100%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | Gigabyte G5 KF5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 15th, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i5-13500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
