Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 outperforms the more expensive HP Omen 16-xd0000sf on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than HP Omen 16-xd0000sf - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than HP Omen 16-xd0000sf - €1199.00 vs €1536.47
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 22 than HP Omen 16-xd0000sf - €8.95 vs €11.55 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mar 3rd, 2023
FPS
133
99%
Value, €/FPS
€11.55/FPS
77%
Price, €
€1536.47
78%
Buy for €1,536.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 3rd, 2023
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
91%
Multi-Core
11190
76%
HP Omen 16-xd0000sf Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
