Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N650MV 15.6" 120Hz 3K OLED on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 91 days newer than ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N650MV 15.6" 120Hz 3K OLED.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 4 than ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N650MV 15.6" 120Hz 3K OLED - 234 vs 221 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FPS
221
94%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
May 1st, 2024
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N650MV 15.6" 120Hz 3K OLED Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31st, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
