Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED N6506MV-MA045X Intel Core Ultra 9 185H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 14 days older than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED N6506MV-MA045X Intel Core Ultra 9 185H.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 23 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED N6506MV-MA045X Intel Core Ultra 9 185H - 168 vs 161 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
161
96%
Value, €/FPS
€14.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2352.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,352.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5477 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED N6506MV-MA045X Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
May 15th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
