Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS ROG Z13 Flow GZ301ZE 13.4" 120Hz Touchscreen on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 820 days newer than ASUS ROG Z13 Flow GZ301ZE 13.4" 120Hz Touchscreen.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 48% better in Dead Space than ASUS ROG Z13 Flow GZ301ZE 13.4" 120Hz Touchscreen - 77 vs 52 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
52
68%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
May 1st, 2024
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
97%
Multi-Core
11484
88%
ASUS ROG Z13 Flow GZ301ZE 13.4" 120Hz Touchscreen Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
13.4" | Screen Size | 16" |