Key Differences
In short — Alienware M16 outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 48% better in Battlefield IV than TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 - 315 vs 213 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 70% cheaper than Alienware M16 - €949.0 vs €3119.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Alienware M16 - €4.46 vs €9.9 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
FPS
315
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.9/FPS
45.050505050505045%
Price, €
€3119
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
FPS
213
67.61904761904762%
Value, €/FPS
€4.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68.10810810810811%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
46.95832254724308%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 19th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
