Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- is 223 days newer than the more expensive Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P).
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 9% better in Saints Row than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - 86 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €2129.00 vs €2226.57
- Up to 12% better value when playing Saints Row than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €24.76 vs €28.18 per FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
79
92%
Value, €/FPS
€28.18/FPS
88%
Price, €
€2226.57
95%
Buy for €2,226.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5450 minutes ago
FPS
86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€24.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5450 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22nd, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
