Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52 15.6 inch on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 is 1309 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52 15.6 inch.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 106% better in Saints Row than Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52 15.6 inch - 74 vs 36 FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jun 1st, 2020 • 2nd Variation
FPS
36
49%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jun 1st, 2020 • 2nd Variation
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jun 1st, 2020 • 2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
84%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jun 1st, 2020 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
57%
Multi-Core
5396
38%
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52 15.6 inch Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
