Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 is 1248 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 300.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 202% better in FIFA 23 than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 127 vs 42 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Aug 1st, 2020
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Aug 1st, 2020
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
94%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 1st, 2020
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1456
60%
Multi-Core
5377
40%
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2434
100%
Multi-Core
13285
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
