Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 is 443 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 300.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 19% better in Resident Evil Village than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 146 vs 123 FPS
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Oct 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Oct 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Oct 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
91%
Multi-Core
10780
75%
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 15th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
